Hi - thanks for the report! This is a known issue, though is not tracked anywhere (aside from the explicit NotImplementedError you found in the code).

Regarding the documentation, the reason it's mentioned there is because the docstring is copied verbatim from scipy.signal.convolve, as is the custom with JAX wrapped numpy/scipy functions. In many cases if you dig hard enough you'll find unimplemented keywords like this one.

I'm going to change this from bug to enhancement, because it's something we know is unimplemented and we hope will be implemented by a team member or community member in the future.

Thanks!

One more thing: the reason this has not yet been implemented is because convolutions are computed via XLA's ConvWithGeneralPadding, and I'm not certain whether it is able to compute the equivalent of scipy's wrapped convolutions.

The best way to implement this is probably to explicitly form the padding values as part of the input to the convolution. Note that jnp.pad supports wrapping padding modes, so perhaps the implementation is as simple as composing the two?

@hawkinsp , great call.

Here is a working example:

from jax.scipy.signal import convolve2d as convolve_jax
from scipy.signal     import convolve2d as convolve_scipy
from jax import random
import jax.numpy as jnp

key = random.PRNGKey(0)

def convolve_wrap(a1,a2):

    N = a1.shape[0]
    a1 = jnp.pad(a1,N,mode='wrap')

    return convolve_jax(a1, a2,mode='same')[N:2*N,N:2*N]

#Filter
N = 5
a2 = jnp.ones((N,N))/N/N

#Image
N = 10
a1 = random.normal(key, (N,N))

#Scipy
a_scipy = convolve_scipy(a1, a2,mode='same',boundary='wrap')

#Jax
a_jax = convolve_wrap(a1,a2)

print(jnp.allclose(a_scipy,a_jax,a_tol=1e-6))

@romanodev Awesome! Would you be interested in contributing a PR that adds support for boundary="wrap" to convolve2d? The implementation is here:

@hawkinsp , I can definitely take a look at that. While the above case is for mode='full', I guess it must be implemented for all modes, as required in https://github.com/google/jax/blob/main/tests/scipy_signal_test.py#L50

Hi @romanodev - don't worry about implementing everything at once if it's blocking you. Even just implementing mode='full' would be useful, and you could adjust the tests to skip unimplemented combinations.

@jakevdp, great! I will resume this next week.

Hi @romanodev

A fix for this issue is included in pull request #21241.

@rajasekharporeddy , awesome!